Thursday, 20 May 2010

Biblical Counseling

Biblical Counceling is a very important ministry in the church, or it should be. Biblical Counseling is often replaced with psychology and various other gimmicks. We must begin to think about how we council people in a way that we can invest the timeless truths of the bible into the persons life. After all it is only the truth that can set someone free.

CCEF
say
“We believe the Bible is more than a book of facts, but truths that are intended to make a difference. God intends biblical truth to touch every area of our lives. But everyone faces moments when the truths of the Bible don't seem to make a difference. Can the Bible's hope really speak to my depression? Can the Bible's peace really speak to my anxiety? Can the Bible's love change even my marriage? At CCEF, we believe that the Bible speaks to all of life's problems, but sometimes everyone needs the careful thought and prayerful wisdom of another who can help us make the connections that make a difference.”

Here is a series of lectures on Biblical Counseling, have a listen and let me know what you think:

Session 1
Session 2
Session 3
Session 4

What if God wrote a book? Harvest Bible Fellowship

Dont have a church you can call home?

Harvest Bible Fellowship 2010 from HBF Church Plants on Vimeo.



If you live in Glasgow visit www.harvestglasgow.org
To find a location near you outside of Glasgow visit http://www.harvestbiblefellowship.us/

Are you emergent?


Are you emergent? Let this little test from Kevin DeYoungs book 'Why we're not emergent by two guys who should be' help you on that one:

“After reading nearly five thousand pages of emerging-church literature, I have no doubt that the emerging church, while loosely defined and far from uniform, can be described and critiqued as a diverse, but recognizable, movement. You might be an emergent Christian: if you listen to U2, Moby, and Johnny Cash’s Hurt (sometimes in church), use sermon illustrations from The Sopranos, drink lattes in the afternoon and Guinness in the evenings, and always use a Mac; if your reading list consists primarily of Stanley Hauerwas, Henri Nouwen, N. T. Wright, Stan Grenz, Dallas Willard, Brennan Manning, Jim Wallis, Frederick Buechner, David Bosch, John Howard Yoder, Wendell Berry, Nancy Murphy, John Franke, Walter Winks and Lesslie Newbigin (not to mention McLaren, Pagitt, Bell, etc.) and your sparring partners include D. A. Carson, John Calvin, Martyn Lloyd-Jones, and Wayne Grudem; if your idea of quintessential Christian discipleship is Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, or Desmond Tutu; if you don’t like George W. Bush or institutions or big business or capitalism or Left Behind Christianity; if your political concerns are poverty, AIDS, imperialism, war-mongering, CEO salaries, consumerism, global warming, racism, and oppression and not so much abortion and gay marriage; if you are into bohemian, goth, rave, or indie; if you talk about the myth of redemptive violence and the myth of certainty; if you lie awake at night having nightmares about all the ways modernism has ruined your life; if you love the Bible as a beautiful, inspiring collection of works that lead us into the mystery of God but is not inerrant; if you search for truth but aren’t sure it can be found; if you’ve ever been to a church with prayer labyrinths, candles, Play-Doh, chalk-drawings, couches, or beanbags (your youth group doesn’t count); if you loathe words like linear, propositional, rational, machine, and hierarchy and use words like ancient-future, jazz, mosaic, matrix, missional, vintage, and dance; if you grew up in a very conservative Christian home that in retrospect seems legalistic, naive, and rigid; if you support women in all levels of ministry, prioritize urban over suburban, and like your theology narrative instead of systematic; if you disbelieve in any sacred-secular divide; if you want to be the church and not just go to church; if you long for a community that is relational, tribal, and primal like a river or a garden; if you believe doctrine gets in the way of an interactive relationship with Jesus; if you believe who goes to hell is no one’s business and no one may be there anyway; if you believe salvation has a little to do with atoning for guilt and a lot to do with bringing the whole creation back into shalom with its Maker; if you believe following Jesus is not believing the right things but living the right way; if it really bugs you when people talk about going to heaven instead of heaven coming to us; if you disdain monological, didactic preaching; if you use the word “story” in all your propositions about postmodernism—if all or most of this tortuously long sentence describes you, then you might be an emergent Christian.”




J. I Packer on the Wrath of God


A wee while ago I read J.I Packer's 'Knowing God' it is a classic! A must read! A quote that struck me in this book was this:

“No doubt it is true that the subject of divine wrath has in the past been handled speculatively, irreverently, even malevolently.  No doubt there have been some who have preached of wrath and damnation with tearless eyes and not pain in their hearts.  No doubt the sign of small sects cheerfully consigning the whole world, apart from themselves, to hell has disgusted many.  Yet if we would know God, it is vital that we face the truth concerning his wrath, however unfashionable it may be, and however strong our initial  prejudices against it.  Otherwise we shall not understand the gospel of salvation from wrath, nor the propitiatory achievement of the cross, nor the wonder of the redeeming love of God” (156).

Sunday, 16 May 2010

Wayne Grudem the musical....

I love Wayne Grudem's Sys-Theo book but would have never thought to make a song about him...

Thursday, 29 April 2010

The Holy what, eh?


First thing is first, a little of my background. The church that I grew up in was cessationist. The preaching was great the people were great and sometimes the praise was great. I often felt that not just in my church but many evangelical and baptist churches like mine had perhaps replaced the Holy Spirit for the Holy Bible. I by no means want to negate the importance of the Word! It is essential and it must be preached in an expository manner.

In my teens I started to infrequently attend some charismatic churches with some friends. I felt like they had something that perhaps my church was missing, however it was pretty much always done in an un-biblical manner often made me feel uncomfortable. But still I felt like I was missing something...

Over the past few years iv really been challenged to study the work of the Holy Spirit and His role today in the church. I'm still wrestling this one through to be honest. I feel like we are often to scared to talk about him in-case something crazy happens like on the God Channel (don't bother watching it). Surely there has to be some balance thou? Right? Is it possible to be a 'Charismatic Calvinist'? I think it is, but what does this look like?

I realise I'm asking a lot of questions here. However I think its something us reformed guys have to work through. Its been put to the side too often. I have seen the Holy Spirit move in power during street preaching in Chicago where a guy ripped of his stookie (cast for you yanks) because his arm was healed. Is this supposed to be normative? I don' know...

Don't get me wrong the most amazing work of God was to save a wretched sinner like me and to continually sanctify me even though in my pride I often don't live according to his will.

Now here is the challenge.

Anyone who is up for it, lets read together this short e-book published by the guys at Resurgance and see if it helps us in our understanding of the Spirits role today. If it happens that we are wrong (my self included), lets repent and change.

Feedback is encouraged.

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Politics and all that Jazz


May 6th is fast approaching us and I still have NO idea who to vote for... It seems that all 4 big parties in Scotland are pretty much for the things I'm against. So in that case who should I vote? Labour, and vote like half of their supporters,:'ill stick with what I know.' Perhaps The Conservatives, whose leader thinks he is a cool dude and he is 'reaching out' to the working class? What about the Lib-Dems who will let you kill your granny and bury her in the back garden. Or the SNP who gave up on independence a long time ago and are all about the EU. Oh,I know!!! the Christian party... well, what one,- yes there is 2 of them(no comment) and neither know anything about politics.

Excuse my facetiousness, but it is kinda difficult too choose...

Here is an article by the Christian Institute who have put together all the manifestos which makes it easy to compare.

Well, id appreciate any feed back or suggestions Re: voting.

Time to go watch the debate...